Los Angeles DUI Lawyer Blog

Articles Posted in Criminal Defense

|

A lot of my clients ask me if they made the right statements during their DUI arrest. Any statement you make will go onto the arrest report and can be used against you when you appear before the judge.

Arresting officers have a right to ask investigative questions. It is their job to build a case and to gather as many facts as possible. You have the right to not say anything self incriminating. While you are required to give the officer your basic information, name, address, driver’s license, insurance, etc., you are not obligated to answer all of their questions pertaining to your evening.

Officers will ask you if you have been drinking, where you were that evening, how much you had to drink, how much you had to eat that evening and any other questions that will help them build a case against you before the judge. You are not required to answer any of these questions.

Continue reading ›

|

There is a very crucial difference between a DUI arrest and a conviction, one that leads to very different consequences.

A DUI arrest is an allegation made by officers that they have facts supporting a guilty finding for driving under the influence. An arrest doesn’t mean that you have been found guilty, it simply means that officers feel that you were driving under the influence and it still remains to be proven. The law will presume you are innocent until you are proven guilty. If you are found guilty in a court of law by either an entered plea, a judge or jury trial, then you will be convicted of a DUI. Until that point, there is no conviction but merely an arrest.

The consequences also have stark differences. With a DUI arrest there is nothing on your record and you are not required to disclose this information to any institution or employer that asks about your criminal record. Remember, a DUI arrest is not on your record because you have not been found guilty of the alleged DUI.

Continue reading ›

|

Over twenty years ago the legal determination of when a person was found to be drunk in excess of the legal amount was based on impairment. That however, is not the case anymore. Modern DUI law uses an objective amount of Blood Alcohol Level (BAC) to determine when a person is excessively drunk and in violation of the law.

Too often the mistake that many people make is to assume that they are not impaired and are able to drive after having a few drinks. This is the first decisions that leads to a DUI arrest and in many cases a conviction.

If a person was found to be unable to walk a straight line, or bring themselves to focus, they would be arrested for a potential DUI conviction. Now the law has changed and is based on a model that relies on a presumptive number. Through the use of a sobriety test, authorities will conclude if you are in violation of DUI law if your BAC is .08% or over. There is no requirement of impairment. Furthermore, prosecution has no duty to prove that you were impaired, only that your BAC was over .08%.

Continue reading ›

|

California Vehicle Code 23600 prohibits driving with any measurable amount of alcohol in your system if you are currently on probation for a DUI. This section of the Vehicle Code is referred to as the Zero Tolerance Law.

Prior to January 2009, the aforementioned section allowed a Judge to revoke probation unless the person violating probation agreed to serve at least 48 hours in County Jail, in the situation that the zero tolerance law was violated and the Blood Alcohol Level (BAC) was over a .04%.

The current law, however, has gotten a lot stricter. If you are now caught violating the Zero Tolerance Law, the DMV will automatically suspend your driver’s license for a year. Additionally, the new law authorizes law enforcement to issue a notice of suspension and impound the vehicle of the person who is caught driving with a BAC over .01%.

In light of the new law , it is now more important than ever to hire an experienced Los Angeles DUI and Criminal Defense attorney who has defended thousands of probation violation and DUI cases. There is a crucial 10 day time limit to request a DMV hearing, which will determine the status of your license. If a DMV hearing is not promptly requested, you may lose your opportunity to state your case to a DMV officer resulting in a revocation or suspension. The knowledgeable attorneys at Hoffman and Associates prepare a powerful defense specific to the facts of your case that you obtain the best desired outcome possible. Our thirty years of experience are reflected in the solid reputation we have built among the many Judges and Prosecutors in the Criminal courts of Southern California.

Continue reading ›

|

When a person is charged with a Los Angeles DUI case they are required by state law to be placed on a minimum of 3 to 5 years of Summary Probation along with a fine to be paid and a rehabilitation program to be completed. In some cases jail time will also be required.

There are two types of probation, informal and formal. Informal probation is generally the case for first offense misdemeanor DUI charges. It is unsupervised whereas formal probation requires the supervision of a deputy probation officer and is usually part of a sentence in more extreme felony charges of DUI.

There are two type of probation violations: external and internal. An internal probation violation results when a person fails to complete the required rehabilitation classes or pay the required fine. An external violation results when a similar crime is committed within the probationary period.s

Continue reading ›

|

In California the courts tend to prefer drug treatment over a jail sentence for those charged with drug offenses. The hope of the court is to rehabilitate the offender rather than punish them by a sentence which could increase the probability of a second offense. Depending on the specific facts of your case an experienced Los Angeles Criminal Defense attorney will be able to tell you if you qualify for one of a few alternative sentences.

Many drug offenders qualify for Proposition 36. Proposition 36, California’s Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act, allows those that have simple drug possession charges and are first or second time offenders to complete a substance abuse program instead of serving jail time. The programs are quite extensive and may include up to one year of education classes, therapy, inpatient or outpatient care and up to six months of aftercare.

Another alternative that may be available is referred to as a Deferred Entry of Judgment (DEJ).sWhen granted a DEJ, the defendant pleads guilty, but is not convicted. The case is put on hold for 18 months and set aside. The defendant must then complete six months of a substance abuse program as well as avoid any additional convictions or charges. After 18 months are over, and the six months of a substance abuse program have successfully been completed, the charge is wiped clean.s

Continue reading ›

|

An experienced Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney has extensive knowledge of the defenses that may potentially apply to a marijuana possession charge. Consequently the case may be dismissed so that you have no conviction on your record.

Most defenses will only be helpful in cases where the amount of marijuana found in possession was less than an ounce. When it is such a small amount, there is a higher chance to persuade the Judge and Prosecution to dismiss or reduce the charges with a powerful and strategic argument. Hoffman and Associates has handled thousands of cases concerned with drug possession over our thirty years of practice. Many have led to dismissal due to the successful and zealous advocacy of our skilled attorneys.

Our attorneys immediately get to work preparing a defense that will most benefit our clients. We begin negotiations with the prosecutor right away and discuss the opportunity for informal diversion. Informal diversion is an agreement that the defendant will attend Narcotics Anonymous or similar meetings in exchange for the charges being dropped. It is far better than court ordered, formal Judgment because it avoids lots of time, and costs as well as the charge itself.

Continue reading ›

|

Many of my clients ask me what it means for those charged with a Federal drug possession charge, especially in regards to charges involving Medical Marijuana in California.

A great majority of marijuana cases are handled by state prosecutors, it is only under certain circumstances that the Federal government may choose to get involved. If there is a very large quantity of marijuana that was found in the possession of the defendant, it would be a matter in which the Federal government would prosecute. Similarly, if it involves international matters, such as crossing national borders with marijuana in possession or the intent to sell the issue becomes one that is no longer in the hands of the State government. Ifsthe charge concerns Federal property such as a national forest or other protected grounds, Federal agents would be the ones who take over the investigation from the State officials and prosecutors.

If the case becomes one for Federal court, certain defenses available in State court are no longer viable. Medical marijuana and California Medical Laws are not recognized as defenses. So it is as beneficial as possible to hire a California Criminal Defense attorney who can powerfully argue in your favor and strive to keep the case in State court.

Continue reading ›

|

Contrary to popular belief, California Vehicle Code 23152 is not limited to charges for driving under the influence of alcohol. Those found driving impaired under the influence of marijuana may be charged for a DUI, even without the presence of alcohol.

In DUI cases involving no alcohol, and solely marijuana, the prosecution has a harder time making a stronger case. This is because State law has determined that a person with a Blood Alcohol Level of .08% makes a driver too impaired to drive.sThere is no set amount of marijuana that causes a person to be too impaired to drive and so the standard is subjective and relies on various factors. Consequently, an experienced Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney has the knowledge and expertise to create a powerful defense, to get a case reduced or even dismissed and in the very least penalties that fall at the lower end of the spectrum.

When pulled over for suspicion of driving the under the influence, you will be given the option to choose a breath or blood test. Criminal Defense attorneys who have handled thousands of marijuana cases will recommend that you take a breath test, as it does not register the THC found in marijuana as readily.

Continue reading ›

|

Although a great number of marijuana drug charges in California involve possession, there is a vast number of charges under California Health and Safety Code 11358 to 11361 involving marijuana that do not center around possession. An experienced Los Angeles DUI and Criminal Defense attorney has not only argued hundreds of cases regarding marijuana charges, but has gained an extensive knowledge of the different exceptions and defenses articulated by law.

California Health and Safety code 11358 criminalizes the planting, cultivation, harvesting and growing or any related action of marijuana and may be punished by imprisonment. Additionally, California Health and Safety code 11359 makes it a criminal charge to possess marijuana for the purpose of sale. Under section 11359 a person may be punished by imprisonment in state prison.

Transporting, importing, furnishing, selling or giving away marijuana into this state yields a much harsher punishment. Equally punished is someone who offers to transport, import, furnish, sell or give away marijuana. Both charges will bring a sentence of imprisonment in state prison for two to four years.

Continue reading ›